Tesla CEO Elon Musk Drops Massive Update About Cybercab: April 2026 Production Confirmed

Tesla CEO Elon Musk just confirmed what many have been waiting for: Cybercab production launches in April 2026 at Gigafactory Texas, with manufacturing speeds that redefine automotive production and pricing that undercuts virtually every competitor in the autonomous vehicle space. Speaking at Tesla's 2025 Annual Shareholder Meeting and reinforced through the company's year-end recap video, Musk declared that 2026 would be "epic" for Tesla, with the Cybercab serving as the centerpiece of the company's transformation from electric vehicle manufacturer to autonomous mobility platform.

The announcement carries weight beyond typical automotive product launches. The Cybercab represents Tesla's first purpose-built autonomous vehicle—no steering wheel, no pedals, no side mirrors—designed exclusively for unsupervised self-driving operation. With a target price below $30,000 and operating costs around 20 cents per mile, the vehicle positions Tesla to fundamentally disrupt urban transportation and ride-hailing services currently dominated by Uber and Lyft.

Tesla CEO Confirms Revolutionary Production Timeline for Cybercab

Elon Musk locked down the production timeline with unusual specificity during the shareholder meeting, stating production would begin "right here in this factory" at Gigafactory Texas in April 2026. This narrows the previously announced Q2 2026 window and represents Tesla's most definitive commitment to launching its autonomous ride-hailing vehicle.

The confirmation came alongside the first public glimpse of the Cybercab's prototype production line at Giga Texas, showcasing Tesla's next-generation "unboxed" manufacturing system. This manufacturing approach fundamentally differs from traditional automotive assembly, breaking the vehicle into large modules that workers assemble in parallel before bringing together near the end of the production line.

The Tesla CEO emphasized the manufacturing system resembles high-volume consumer electronics more than conventional car production, with an ultimate target of less than a 10-second cycle time—essentially producing one vehicle every 10 seconds. For context, the Model Y currently requires approximately 34 seconds per unit, meaning the Cybercab production line could theoretically output vehicles at more than three times the speed.

The production speed implications are staggering. Musk indicated that at full capacity, the production line could potentially reach 2-3 million Cybercabs annually, with a theoretical maximum of 5 million units if the company achieves a five-second cycle time. These numbers dwarf current production volumes for any single Tesla model and signal the company's ambition to flood markets with affordable autonomous vehicles.

The timeline and production targets represent classic Musk ambition—aggressive, boundary-pushing, and historically prone to delays. However, the specificity of the April 2026 date, combined with visible production line prototypes at Giga Texas, suggests more concrete progress than previous Tesla product announcements.

Elon Musk Reveals Cybercab Pricing and Operating Economics

The economics of the Cybercab could fundamentally reshape urban transportation. Tesla CEO Elon Musk confirmed the vehicle would be priced below $30,000, positioning it competitively against mass-market sedans while offering fully autonomous capability. This pricing strategy makes the Cybercab accessible not just to fleet operators but potentially to individual owners who want to participate in Tesla's robotaxi network.

Musk claims operating costs will reach approximately 20 cents per mile, compared to roughly one dollar per mile for conventional bus systems. If these economics hold, the Cybercab could provide transportation cheaper than public transit while offering door-to-door convenience and privacy.

The business model flexibility represents one of the Cybercab's most intriguing aspects. Tesla plans to sell the Cybercab directly to consumers who can use it for personal transportation or operate it as part of their own autonomous taxi fleet. This allows individual owners to generate revenue from their vehicles during periods when they're not using them—essentially turning every Cybercab into a potential income-generating asset.

For fleet operators, the sub-$30,000 price point and low operating costs create compelling unit economics. Traditional ride-hailing services face significant driver costs that autonomous vehicles eliminate entirely. If a Cybercab operates 50 hours per week (leaving over 100 hours for maintenance and charging), it could complete thousands of rides monthly without driver expenses, insurance costs associated with human operators, or limitations on operating hours.

The revenue potential extends beyond ride-hailing. Musk noted Tesla plans to "overspec" the Cybercab's computer, making vehicles available for distributed computing similar to Amazon Web Services. When not actively providing rides, Cybercabs could lease their computational power for AI training, rendering, or other processing tasks, creating additional revenue streams for owners.

Understanding the Cybercab: Specifications and Design Philosophy

Autonomous-First Design Without Compromise

The Cybercab's design represents a fundamental departure from Tesla's existing vehicle lineup. Musk described it as "very much optimized for the lowest cost per mile in an autonomous mode," noting that every Tesla produced in recent years already carries the hardware needed for full self-driving. By eliminating the steering wheel, pedals, and side mirrors entirely, Tesla reduces manufacturing complexity, weight, and cost while creating a cabin optimized for passenger comfort rather than driver operation.

The two-seat configuration prioritizes the most common use case in ride-hailing: single passengers or couples traveling together. The compact footprint improves urban maneuverability and parking efficiency while reducing material costs and energy consumption. The vehicle features aluminum body panels rather than stainless steel, reducing both weight and manufacturing costs, with butterfly doors that open vertically.

The interior centers around passenger experience rather than driving dynamics. A single bench seat accommodates two passengers with ample legroom, centered around a large screen for entertainment and trip information. The design acknowledges that autonomous vehicle passengers want comfort and connectivity, not driving engagement.

Technical Specifications and Performance

Specification	Details
Seating Capacity	2 passengers
Price Target	Under $30,000
Operating Cost	~$0.20 per mile
Range	200 miles (320 km)
Battery Capacity	35 kWh
Efficiency	5.5 mi/kWh (8.9 km/kWh)
Charging	Inductive wireless, 90%+ efficiency
Production Start	April 2026
Cycle Time Target	10 seconds (ultimate: 5 seconds)
Annual Production Potential	2-3 million units (theoretical max: 5 million)

The Cybercab supports inductive charging with efficiency exceeding 90%, eliminating the need for charging ports or cables. This wireless charging capability is essential for autonomous fleet operation, allowing vehicles to charge themselves without human intervention. The system builds on Tesla's 2023 acquisition of German wireless charging firm Wiferion and has been tested at power levels around 19-25 kW.

The relatively modest 35 kWh battery capacity reflects the vehicle's efficiency optimization and intended use case. A 200-mile range proves adequate for urban robotaxi service, where vehicles return to charging stations regularly rather than completing long-distance trips. The smaller battery reduces weight, cost, and charging time while still providing sufficient range for a full day of urban operation.

Full Self-Driving Technology at the Core

The Cybercab relies entirely on Tesla's camera-based Full Self-Driving (FSD) system, the same technology deployed in Model 3 and Model Y vehicles. Unlike competitors like Waymo that use LiDAR sensors, Tesla relies solely on camera-based vision, believing that human-like perception through cameras provides a more scalable approach to autonomous driving.

The FSD hardware includes multiple cameras providing 360-degree visibility, along with powerful AI computing hardware that processes visual information in real-time. The system has accumulated billions of miles of real-world driving data from Tesla's existing fleet, creating a training dataset that competitors struggle to match.

However, this camera-only approach remains controversial. Current FSD requires driver supervision, with independent testing showing intervention needs approximately every 13 miles. For the Cybercab to operate without steering wheels or pedals, Tesla must achieve dramatically improved reliability—a technical challenge that remains uncertain despite Musk's confidence.

Robotaxi Service Expansion and Current Operations

Austin Launch and Early Performance Metrics

Tesla's robotaxi service launched in Austin in June 2025 using modified Model Y vehicles equipped with FSD software. The service has covered over 250,000 miles in Austin and more than one million miles in the Bay Area where safety drivers remain present. The company has experienced roughly one crash for every 312,500 miles driven—a statistic Musk points to as evidence of improving safety.

The Austin deployment represents Tesla's first truly unsupervised autonomous ride-hailing service, though it operates under limited conditions and geographic areas. Passengers summon vehicles through Tesla's app, similar to conventional ride-hailing services, but without human drivers present. The current fleet consists entirely of Model Y vehicles; Cybercabs will supplement and eventually replace these conventional vehicles once production begins.

The Bay Area operation differs significantly, still requiring safety drivers in the front seat. This reflects California's more stringent regulatory requirements for autonomous vehicle testing. The company currently holds permits only for supervised autonomous driving in California, not the fully driverless operation it conducts in Texas.

Planned Expansion to Additional Markets

Musk announced the robotaxi service will expand to Miami, Dallas, Phoenix, and Las Vegas, positioning Tesla to operate in multiple major metropolitan markets. Each market presents different regulatory challenges, population densities, and transportation needs, allowing Tesla to refine its service across diverse conditions.

Miami and Las Vegas represent tourist-heavy markets with strong demand for ride-hailing services and relatively autonomous-vehicle-friendly regulatory environments. Dallas adds another major Texas market where the state's supportive stance toward autonomous vehicles facilitates deployment. Phoenix has served as a testing ground for Waymo's robotaxi service, offering an established regulatory framework and public familiarity with autonomous rides.

The expansion timeline remains unclear, with regulatory approvals serving as the primary constraint. According to recent reports, Tesla has not yet completed necessary paperwork to begin offering robotaxi rides in Arizona and Nevada, two of the targeted expansion states. Florida's looser regulations may allow faster deployment there, but the overall expansion pace will depend on navigating state-by-state and city-by-city regulatory frameworks.

Regulatory Challenges and Approval Timeline

The Regulatory Reality Check

Responding to shareholder questions about regulatory confidence, Musk stated he believes the rate of regulatory approval will roughly match the rate of Cybercab production, acknowledging it might be "a little tight". This optimism reflects Musk's belief that successful operations in Austin and favorable safety statistics will pave the way for broader approvals.

The Cybercab faces unique regulatory hurdles due to its lack of conventional controls. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards require steering wheels and pedals in most circumstances, meaning Tesla must secure exemptions from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Tesla aims to secure exemptions for 2,500 Cybercabs from NHTSA and obtain permits for driverless testing in California by late 2026.

State-level regulations add complexity. Texas law currently allows autonomous vehicle testing but requires specific authorization for commercial deployment starting May 2026. California demands extensive testing and reporting before granting driverless permits. Other states maintain varying requirements, creating a patchwork of regulations that Tesla must navigate market-by-market.

Musk thanked Waymo for "paving the regulatory path," acknowledging that Waymo's years of autonomous vehicle operation since 2020 have established precedents that benefit all autonomous vehicle developers. As autonomous services expand across multiple cities and safety records accumulate, regulators may become more comfortable approving additional deployments.

European and International Expansion

Tesla anticipates receiving regulatory approval for supervised FSD in Europe as early as February 2026, which would significantly expand the company's autonomous driving market reach. European approval represents a critical milestone for Tesla's global ambitions, opening access to major metropolitan markets across the continent.

However, European regulations remain more stringent than American requirements. The European Union requires extensive documentation, testing, and compliance with Type Approval processes before autonomous systems can operate commercially. Even supervised FSD—requiring human oversight—faces significant regulatory scrutiny.

China represents another crucial market for Tesla's autonomous ambitions, though the regulatory environment there proves even more complex. Chinese regulations require extensive local testing, data residency requirements, and approval processes that favor domestic manufacturers. Tesla's Shanghai Gigafactory provides a manufacturing presence, but autonomous vehicle approvals remain uncertain.

Competitive Landscape and Market Position

Waymo's Head Start and Different Approach

Waymo currently operates commercial robotaxi services in San Francisco, Phoenix, and Los Angeles, maintaining a significant operational lead over Tesla. Waymo uses LiDAR sensors for autonomous driving, taking a sharply different technical approach than Tesla's camera-only system. Waymo's vehicles include extensive sensor suites that provide redundancy and detailed environmental mapping, contrasting with Tesla's vision-first philosophy.

The technical approaches reflect different philosophies about autonomous driving. Waymo prioritizes safety through redundant sensors and conservative operational parameters, limiting deployment to extensively mapped areas with favorable conditions. Tesla prioritizes scalability through vision-based systems and aggressive real-world testing, accepting higher risk in exchange for faster learning and broader deployment.

Waymo has completed hundreds of millions of autonomous miles and operates a growing fleet that now exceeds 2,500 vehicles across multiple markets. The company has established working relationships with regulators and demonstrated commercial viability for autonomous ride-hailing services. This operational track record provides valuable precedent that benefits all autonomous vehicle developers, including Tesla.

Traditional Automakers and Ride-Hailing Services

General Motors' Cruise program faced significant setbacks in 2024-2025, suspending operations after safety incidents and regulatory challenges. The program's struggles demonstrate the difficulty of scaling autonomous vehicles even with massive financial resources and technical expertise. GM continues developing autonomous technology but has scaled back ambitious deployment timelines.

Uber and Lyft face existential threats from autonomous vehicles. Their business models depend on human drivers who represent the largest cost component in ride-hailing services. Autonomous vehicles eliminate driver costs while operating 24/7 without breaks, fundamentally changing the economics of ride-hailing. Both companies are exploring partnerships with autonomous vehicle developers, recognizing they must adapt or face disruption.

Traditional automakers including Ford, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, and others maintain autonomous vehicle programs but have generally scaled back ambitions after underestimating technical and regulatory challenges. Most now focus on advanced driver assistance systems rather than fully autonomous vehicles, leaving the robotaxi market primarily to Tesla, Waymo, and Chinese competitors.

Chinese Competition and BYD's Rise

Companies including BYD and Xiaomi now offer similar driver-assistance systems as standard features, undermining Tesla's differentiation strategy, with BYD having sold more battery-electric vehicles worldwide for five consecutive quarters. Chinese manufacturers benefit from supportive government policies, massive domestic markets, and rapid innovation cycles.

Chinese autonomous vehicle companies including Baidu's Apollo, Pony.ai, and WeRide operate robotaxi services in multiple Chinese cities, though regulations prevent foreign companies from easily entering these markets. The Chinese autonomous vehicle market is developing largely independently from Western markets, creating parallel ecosystems with different technical standards, regulatory frameworks, and consumer expectations.

BYD's rise represents a broader competitive threat to Tesla beyond autonomous vehicles. The Chinese manufacturer has achieved scale that rivals Tesla while offering vehicles at lower price points. BYD's vertical integration, from battery production to vehicle assembly, provides cost advantages that Tesla struggles to match, particularly in price-sensitive markets.

Investment Implications and Valuation Impact

Wall Street's Mixed Reception

Tesla's stock demonstrated remarkable resilience throughout 2025, recovering after plummeting 45% by early April amid CEO controversies, with recovery accelerating following the robotaxi service launch in Austin using Model Y vehicles with safety operators. The stock performance reflects investor belief in Tesla's autonomous vehicle potential despite near-term execution challenges.

Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities characterized 2026 as potentially pivotal for Tesla, stating that autonomous technology could add a trillion dollars to the company's valuation and enable Tesla to capture roughly 80% of the autonomous vehicle market. This bullish outlook assumes successful Cybercab deployment, regulatory approval across major markets, and consumer acceptance of autonomous vehicles.

However, skepticism remains widespread. The October 2024 Cybercab unveiling disappointed many investors due to lack of technical details, unclear regulatory pathways, and ambitious timelines that conflicted with Musk's history of overpromising. Shares declined in the days following the announcement, reflecting concern that Tesla's autonomous ambitions remain speculative rather than imminent.

Cathie Wood's Radical Valuation Model

Cathie Wood's Ark Invest projects that 88% of Tesla's enterprise value will derive from robotaxis by 2029, compared to just 9% from electric vehicle sales. This represents a radical reimagining of Tesla's business model, transforming from manufacturing and selling vehicles to operating a massive autonomous transportation network generating recurring service revenue.

Ark's median case assumes robotaxi rollout beginning in late 2025 (which has already proven overly optimistic) and rapid scaling thereafter. The valuation depends on assumptions about ride-hailing market size, Tesla's market share, average fares, operating costs, and regulatory approval timelines—each of which contains significant uncertainty.

The bullish case requires Tesla to not only develop reliable autonomous technology but also establish operational excellence in fleet management, maintenance, customer service, insurance, and regulatory compliance across dozens of markets worldwide. Success would transform Tesla into something resembling Uber with better economics, while failure could leave the company as a conventional automaker with shrinking margins.

Revenue Diversification and AI Platform Value

Visible Alpha projects Cybercab could generate $1 billion in revenue during 2026 alone, with growth accelerating as the service expands, representing a shift from hardware-based sales to recurring software-driven revenue similar to tech giants like Apple and Amazon. This business model transformation could justify premium valuations if Tesla successfully executes.

The recurring revenue model fundamentally changes Tesla's financial profile. Rather than one-time vehicle sales, robotaxi rides generate ongoing income throughout each vehicle's lifespan. Additionally, software subscriptions, data monetization, and distributed computing revenue create multiple income streams from each Cybercab produced.

Dan Ives estimates Tesla's AI and autonomous vehicle capabilities could enable the company to capture 70% of the global autonomous vehicle market by 2030, driven by scale and data advantages. This market dominance scenario depends on Tesla's FSD technology achieving clear superiority over competitors and network effects that make Tesla's service the default choice for autonomous rides.

Manufacturing Innovation and Unboxed Process

Revolutionizing Automotive Production

The "unboxed" manufacturing process represents Tesla's most significant production innovation since introducing the Model 3 line. Traditional automotive assembly builds vehicles sequentially on a single line, with each station adding components in order. The unboxed process breaks vehicles into large modules assembled in parallel, then brought together near the end of production.

Musk described the Cybercab manufacturing system as resembling high-volume consumer electronics rather than traditional car production, targeting an ultimate cycle time of less than 10 seconds per unit. This speed is unprecedented in automotive manufacturing and could only be achieved through radical process simplification and parallel work streams.

The process depends on several factors: simplified vehicle design with fewer parts, standardized interfaces between modules, extensive automation, and optimized material flow. The Cybercab's lack of steering wheel, pedals, and conventional controls eliminates complexity, while the two-seat configuration reduces the number of components compared to conventional vehicles.

Gigafactory Texas as Cybercab Production Hub

The Cybercab will be assembled at Giga Texas, Tesla's expansive manufacturing facility, serving as the hub for Tesla's entry into the commercial robotaxi market. Giga Texas provides sufficient space for the unboxed production system's parallel assembly areas and has proximity to Austin, where Tesla is currently testing its robotaxi service.

The facility's location in Texas provides additional advantages. The state maintains relatively business-friendly regulations and has demonstrated openness to autonomous vehicle testing and deployment. Proximity to testing operations allows tight feedback loops between manufacturing and real-world performance, enabling rapid iteration on design and production processes.

Tesla plans to expand Cybercab production to additional factories once the process is proven at Giga Texas. The modular manufacturing system should be replicable across facilities, allowing Tesla to scale production globally while maintaining consistent quality and efficiency. However, the company must first demonstrate the process works at scale before committing to additional factories.

The Path Forward: Realistic Assessment of 2026 Outlook

What Could Go Right

If Tesla executes successfully, 2026 could indeed prove "epic" for the company. Regulatory approvals in Texas, California, and several other states would allow rapid Cybercab deployment across major metropolitan markets. Strong safety records from expanding operations would build public confidence and facilitate additional approvals. Production scaling to hundreds of thousands of units by year-end would establish Tesla as the dominant autonomous vehicle manufacturer.

The sub-$30,000 price point combined with proven autonomous capability would attract both fleet operators and individual buyers, creating immediate market validation. Revenue from ride-hailing services would begin flowing, demonstrating the business model's viability and providing recurring income that supports premium valuations. Successful launches would position 2027 for massive scaling, potentially reaching millions of Cybercabs in operation.

European and international approvals would open enormous additional markets, establishing Tesla's autonomous technology as the global standard. Partnerships with municipalities could integrate Cybercabs into public transportation systems, providing sustainable urban mobility solutions. The distributed computing model could generate significant additional revenue, making Cybercabs valuable even when not providing rides.

What Could Go Wrong

Regulatory approval for unsupervised driving has not yet been granted, and Musk's history of ambitious yet delayed timelines has tempered expectations, with regulatory bodies requiring evidence of safety and reliability before granting approvals. Delays in state-level approvals could leave Tesla with thousands of Cybercabs it cannot legally operate, creating inventory and cash flow problems.

Independent tests show FSD drivers need to intervene every 13 miles, highlighting significant gaps in performance compared to the reliability needed for unsupervised operation. High-profile accidents involving Cybercabs could trigger regulatory crackdowns, damaging public perception and delaying widespread deployment. Safety incidents would receive massive media coverage, potentially setting back the entire autonomous vehicle industry.

Tesla has reportedly not completed necessary paperwork to begin offering robotaxi rides in Arizona and Nevada, and its California permit only allows supervised driving, suggesting the company may not actually be ready to scale Robotaxi despite claims to shareholders. Production could begin on schedule but vehicles sit unused while regulatory approvals remain pending. The April 2026 timeline could slip as manufacturing challenges emerge with the new unboxed process.

Market acceptance represents another uncertainty. Consumers may prove reluctant to trust vehicles without manual controls, particularly following any safety incidents. The robotaxi market may prove smaller than projected if consumers prefer vehicle ownership or conventional ride-hailing with human drivers. Competition from Waymo, Chinese manufacturers, and revitalized programs from traditional automakers could fragment the market.

Most Likely Scenario

The reality likely falls between bullish and bearish extremes. Production probably begins roughly on schedule in mid-2026, though perhaps not quite in April as stated. Initial volumes remain modest as Tesla refines the manufacturing process and addresses inevitable production challenges. The company secures limited regulatory approvals in Tesla-friendly jurisdictions like Texas but faces delays in California and other stringent markets.

By year-end 2026, thousands of Cybercabs operate in Austin, Dallas, Miami, and perhaps one or two additional markets. The service generates positive customer feedback and decent safety statistics, though not without occasional incidents. Revenue from robotaxi operations reaches hundreds of millions but falls short of the most optimistic projections. Tesla demonstrates the business model works but hasn't yet achieved the scale needed to transform company valuation.

The real question isn't whether 2026 proves "epic" but whether it establishes a foundation for massive scaling in 2027-2028. If Tesla demonstrates reliable autonomous operation, achieves acceptable safety records, and navigates regulatory approvals successfully, the multi-million unit production targets become plausible. If technical or regulatory challenges prove more difficult than expected, the Cybercab could remain a niche product rather than a transformative business.

Considering a Tesla Trade-In? Know Your Vehicle's Value

As Tesla pushes forward with revolutionary products like the Cybercab, existing Tesla owners face important decisions about their current vehicles. Whether you're considering upgrading to prepare for the autonomous future or simply evaluating your options, understanding your Tesla's current market value is essential.

We developed the Tesla Trade-In Valuation Tool to help owners estimate their vehicle's value accurately. The tool considers current market conditions, your specific vehicle configuration, mileage, and condition to provide a realistic valuation range. This information helps you make informed decisions about timing your trade-in or sale.

For comprehensive guidance on maximizing your Tesla's trade-in value and navigating the process, check out our Trade-In Guide. The guide covers preparation steps, timing considerations, negotiation strategies, and alternatives to traditional dealer trade-ins. Whether you're trading toward a new Tesla or moving to a different vehicle entirely, proper preparation can significantly impact the value you receive.

Conclusion: The Cybercab Gambit

Tesla CEO Elon Musk's confirmation of April 2026 Cybercab production represents one of the boldest moves in automotive history—a purpose-built autonomous vehicle manufactured at unprecedented speeds and priced to undercut virtually all competition. The vision is compelling: affordable, ubiquitous autonomous transportation that transforms urban mobility while generating massive recurring revenue for Tesla.

The execution risks are equally significant. Autonomous vehicle technology remains unproven at scale. Regulatory frameworks are uncertain and vary dramatically across jurisdictions. Manufacturing at the promised speeds could prove far more challenging than Musk suggests. Market acceptance of steering-wheel-free vehicles is unknown. Competition from Waymo, Chinese manufacturers, and revitalized traditional automakers could fragment the market.

The coming months will prove crucial. Does production actually begin in April 2026? Do regulatory approvals materialize? Can Tesla demonstrate the safety and reliability needed for unsupervised operation? These questions will determine whether 2026 truly proves "epic" for Tesla or whether the Cybercab joins the long list of ambitious Musk promises that took years longer than projected to materialize.

For Tesla bulls, the Cybercab represents the company's evolution from automaker to technology platform, justifying premium valuations through recurring autonomous service revenue. For skeptics, it represents another overpromised, underdelivered distraction from the core vehicle business facing intensifying competition and slowing demand. The truth will likely emerge throughout 2026 as production begins, initial deployments occur, and the regulatory landscape clarifies.

What's certain is that Tesla is betting big on autonomous vehicles, with the Cybercab serving as the primary vehicle for that bet. The sub-$30,000 price point, revolutionary manufacturing process, and target of millions of annual units represent unprecedented ambition. Whether that ambition translates to transformative success or expensive failure will define Tesla's trajectory for the remainder of the decade.

The autonomous vehicle revolution is coming—the only questions are when, how quickly, and who emerges as the dominant player. Tesla CEO Elon Musk has placed his chips firmly on the Cybercab being that answer. Time will tell if he's right.